Latest Updates

A Lollypop or a Bullet Discussion: Who Killed the Rabbit?

Screen Shot 2016-01-01 at 14.24.39

This has long since been a source of controversy amongst A Lollypop or a Bullet fans – did Mokuzu kill the rabbits, or did Kanajima kill the rabbits? I have my own reasoning, but first, let’s take a look at the evidence on each side.



  • From the beginning, she was terrified of the rabbits for some unknown reason.
  • She can’t tell love from hate, didn’t seem to care when Kanajima got mad, and had no problem revealing Nagisa’s crush, revealing an innate sense of cruelty (likely twisted from abuse).

Screen Shot 2016-01-01 at 20.36.42

Mokuzu looking at the lock combination

  • She went in to the rabbit hutch the day before with Nagisa, so we know for sure she saw the combination.
  • The rabbit’s head was in her bag, and the bag had blood stains on it.
  • She was at school early that day, according to Kanajima.


Screen Shot 2016-01-01 at 20.35.30

Baseball cap boy watching from a distance

  • Nagisa saw a boy wearing a baseball cap and holding a bat the day before, watching them as they left the hutch. She thought it was likely Kanajima.
  • A baseball bat would make an ideal tool for killing rabbits.
  • Kanajima was the one who found the rabbits, the one whose footsteps were in the hutch, and the one covered in blood.
  • He was already angry because he feels like Mokuzu and Nagisa teamed up to play him.
  • The hutch’s lock combination was his birthday, so he could have known it that way.


Two Main Theories

Mokuzu Theory


Mokuzu killed the rabbits out of a warped sense of love/hate and possibly a desire to monopolize Nagisa’s attention or destroy the things she loves. Kanajima found the scene likely because he had been paying extra attention to Mokuzu, and saw her in the morning near the rabbit hutch. When he saw Mokuzu in the classroom he got angry not just because of the slaughter, but also because she had been shunning him this whole time for Nagisa, and the rabbits were just more twisted proof of this. In a mixture of hatred, jealousy, and anger, he accused her but got framed instead, at which point he lost it and beat her up. The rabbit’s head was in Mokuzu’s bag out of some twisted sense of love, like how her father dismembered Pochi and left the head on top.

Kanajima Theory

Screen Shot 2016-01-01 at 14.27.42

Kanajima killed the rabbits, but Mokuzu sneakily cut off a head and took it with her as some sort of messed up memento, because she knew Nagisa loved the rabbits. There are several versions of this: some people believe Kanajima killed the rabbits the night before, and saw Mokuzu in the morning leaving (with rabbit’s head), so hurried back to check. Other believe Kanajima killed the rabbits in the morning, after Mokuzu had already killed or found a single dead rabbit and taken its head. Only after killing the rabbits did he realize one was headless. He accused Mokuzu because he suspected she took the head, and when his crimes were seen through he got angry and beat her up.

The Truth

It’s still up for debate, but I for one believe Mokuzu killed the rabbits. There are a couple things we can deduce for sure:

Rabbit head

Rabbit head in Mokuzu’s bag

  1. Mokuzu was the one who decapitated the rabbit and put it in her bag. Some say Kanajima could have put it there to frame her, but that makes no sense. He wouldn’t be horrified to the point of repeating himself over and over if he had been the one to do it, and if he wanted to frame Mokuzu from the get go he would have said to check her bag. Given how the dog and Mokuzu (at the end) were both decapitated, we can conclude that this behavior comes from some twisted mindset she picked up from her father.
  2. Kanajima did not know the lock’s combination. He came up to Nagisa later on and asked if the thing about his birthday was true, and the way Nagisa froze up when Mokuzu revealed her crush is evidence that he didn’t know about Nagisa’s crush beforehand. He was also momentarily flustered when Mokuzu said his birthday, which could have been because for a moment he thought she was interested in him. This doesn’t rule him out however, since Mokuzu could have gone inside to decapitate a single rabbit and left the door unlocked.

Screen Shot 2016-01-03 at 18.13.57

Mokuzu revealing her friend’s crush

If Kanajima did not know the lock’s combination, Mokuzu must have unlocked the rabbit hutch, since Nagisa always locks it when she leaves. This leaves us with the possibility that Kanajima slips in after seeing Mokuzu coming from the hutch in the morning (having decapitated a single rabbit), and slaughters all the rabbits then.

Screen Shot 2016-01-03 at 20.24.13

An enraged innocent? Or a cover for his guilt?

But why? Is the sight of Mokuzu and the thought of her tending after Nagisa’s rabbits enough to throw him into a rabbit-slaughtering rampage? That seems a little far fetched. After all, it is clear from his conversations with Nagisa later that he is angry at Mokuzu, not Nagisa, and he must know that this will hurt Nagisa more than it would Mokuzu. On top of that, he is aware that Mokuzu who usually comes late to school is early today, so he must be on his guard for something fishy… which means he’s likely to investigate, not rampage. The most likely time for him to have lost his head and go on a slaughter-fest was right after school, when he saw the two girls leaving together from the rabbit hutch, but that’s impossible if he didn’t know the combination.

Screen Shot 2016-01-05 at 14.28.10

The clincher is this. If Kanajima were the one who slaughtered the rabbits, that means he accused Mokuzu to frame her. Either that or he suspected she took a rabbit head and just wanted to get back at her. However, Mokuzu brings up the police and the evidence in the hutch, which points to him, not her. If he had been the one who committed the crime, at this point (in his POV) his lies have been revealed, and it is far more likely for him to be caught off guard, stutter, seem lost for a moment than it is for him to blow a fuse. Much more likely that he snapped because he was telling the truth but couldn’t figure out how to get past her devilish tongue.

Those are my beliefs. Officially, Nagisa couldn’t figure it out, and concluded that if Kanajima were the killer, the next target would be Mokuzu, and if Mokuzu were the killer, the next target would be her brother Tomohiko. However, Mokuzu dies by her father’s hand before either of those murders could occur, so the mystery remains unsolved in the story.

What Happened During the S&M Scene Then?

A common follow-up question is: if Kanajima wasn’t crazy, then what the hell was going on during that S&M scene afterwards?

Kanajima tripping Mokuzu

Kanajima tripping Mokuzu

I believe Kanajima was pulled into a downward spiral ever since meeting Mokuzu. The first day, he tripped her. Some people say this is proof that he was already mental to begin with, but I respectfully disagree. At the age of 13, kids can be cruel, and this does not necessarily indicate mental health issues. He may have just wanted to mess with her a little bit, attract her attention, or simply play a prank. None of the kids knew about her disability then, and it’s clear the whole class thought she was strange and even laughed along. Kanajima probably thought she was pretty but weird. If she had been the typical shoujo girl who was just somewhat weird/geeky/antisocial etc., it could easily have developed into a cute love story.

Unfortunately, Mokuzu is much more battered and twisted than the average “eek I have no friends!” heroine. When Kanajima plucks up his courage to invite her out, a typical heroine who is not interested in the other party might:


Mokuzu acts oblivious when found out

  1. Accept but feel uncomfortable/don’t really like it/don’t know what to do
  2. Reject and avoid him, or just try to avoid him and hope he gets the hint
  3. Reject derisively, or even laugh in his face

However, Mokuzu’s response diverges from all of those in its total indifference. She just. doesn’t. care. The above reactions may be upsetting, but they all show some sort of awareness of the guy, whether it’s negative awareness (disgust, fear) which leads her to avoid him, or using the guy as a stepping stone to bolster her own superiority complex. It may sound awful, but even negative attention is a form of attention.

Popular on Amazon

Screen Shot 2016-01-05 at 12.41.46The most obvious, respectful thing to do, of course, would be to just reject the guy candidly. Mokuzu doesn’t do that either – she strings him along, and then ignores him and even ditches him. The strange part is that she doesn’t do so out of either a weak ego (where she toys with the guy to make herself feel better/superior) or discomfort with his affections. She simply does it, and observes, and when it hurts Kanajima she doesn’t care and even enjoys it out of some twisted cruel sense of self which can no longer distinguish between hate and love.

I believe this is what drives Kanajima over the edge. By the time the rabbit incident occurs, he in many ways looks down on her as dysfunctional and loathsome, yet can’t rid himself of his attraction to her. When he finds out after his suspension about her abuse, he is shocked and truly remorseful, yet the original feelings remain deeply rooted. This conglomerate of guilt, remorse, disgust, and attraction is what leads him to behave in a masochistic manner and say conflicting things like “I’m sorry” and “You’re dirty” in his final encounter with Mokuzu.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.